Friday, 2 August 2013

Something different

There's been a lot of talk in Britain recently about the issue of food poverty. Despite being a G8 country, despite being a supposed world leader with a high GDP, despite being a world leader in global development aid assistance, Britain isn't sorting itself out very well, and there is a growing issue of food poverty here. There are two types of food poverty - there's the type where people can afford to eat, btu through ignorance or convenience, are choosing foods which mean they have a deficit of the appropriate nutrition. But then there's the other type. The type that A Girl Called Jack has documented in heart-breaking fashion in her blog. People who - through circumstances that have changed, through a shitty economy and the crappy state of the banks - are going hungry. Jacks' story is better told in her voice, so do read her blog. She's become the 'face of food poverty' in Britain, which is a title I'm certain she'd rather not have claimed. But her story has helped to raise awareness of what's happening in towns and cities across this country. And her recipes are so wonderfully budget friendly and healthy that they are now being handed out with food parcels across Britain.

The BBC did a special episode of its Great British Menu show a month or so back: called the Great British Budget Menu. In it, three celebrity chefs were assigned to three people/families who were struggling to eat on the tiny budget they had. It was deeply humbling and so very sad to hear their stories. One man, a pensioner, had worked his whole life and paid into the state pension, but the amount he was receiving meant that he could afford little more than packets of soup after he paid the rent on his tiny studio flat with its sad single bed. He split one of those watery packets of soup and had half for lunch and half for dinner - if he was lucky, he could have a slice of bread with it. This is someone who worked his whole life, and now he can hardly afford to feed himself?! That's wrong. As is the family of 5 who - even with two incomes - haven't got enough of a food budget to feed the family healthy meals. Processed food is so cheap. So incredibly cheap. Their budget didn't allow for anything else. And the working single mum who routinely went hungry so that her 12 year old daughter could eat regular meals. I think you can watch the TV show on Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6Vm8M_vnSdMohB99KL7tSEyDXplunNC

The thing that was wrong with this well-intentioned show, is that the chefs were completely incapable of sticking to a budget. One of them decided, to hell with the budget - I'll buy the family a side of SALMON and let them enjoy it (?!) A nice enough thought, perhaps, but a total misunderstanding of the dire state fo these people's budgets. They don't have money to 'splurge' on a big piece of protein just 'because'. They're trying to decide whether they can afford to have the extra slice of bread with their soup. There's no room to run 'just a wee bit over' the budget. It was frankly outrageous (and I was not the only one to think so!) As if that wasn't bad enough, the solutions offered by policy-makers in the show were that supermarkets need to do more. Passing the buck. Well, perhaps, but that's not the whole problem. If supermarkets cut prices, they're going to take that out of the money they pay farmers, and they're already struggling. The bigger issue is that people aren't earning a sufficient wage to account for the rising costs of electricity, gas, rent and food. Salaries have not kept pace with inflation, and since the economic downturn in Britain, the number of people visiting food banks has been rising exponentially.

It all makes me so incredibly mad. Watching the show and reading Jack's blog, I felt guilty at my own good fortune, but also angry as hell that I live in a country that can allow this to happen. And I know many other 'Western' nations are the same. I'm sure there are families in Auckland and Christchurch in NZ who have similar experiences.

Food banks aren't the solution. They're a band-aid on the problem, but until policy-makers can really try to fix this (and not just spout empty rhetoric), food banks are a vital part of ensuring that people aren't going hungry.

A Girl Called Jack posted an idea on Twitter this week. Her idea was that for £3 - the price of a coffee - you could buy sufficient food for 22 meals for one person. She asked people to sacrifice one of their weekly coffees, go to their supermarket and buy these items and donate them to their local food bank. They don't provide a well-rounded meal, but like she said, it's better than going hungry.

I had been thinking about joining a group called 'Foodie Penpals' where you basically send a parcel of nice foodie treats to another person in another country each month with a £10 budget. After reading Jack's post, I realised that I'd much rather put that £10 towards helping to ensure other people have enough to eat. I have more than enough. We are incredibly lucky that we are able to eat whatever we want, whenever we want. The very least we can do is share that. So today I took that £10 to the supermarket and bought some food.

Bread, baked beans, tinned tomatoes, sliced carrots, sweetcorn, tuna, sardines, vege stock cubes, mixed herbs, pasta, jam, soap
To be honest, I was a bit surprised at how much I was able to buy, by sticking to the budget branded products. I was also a bit surprised, once I started shopping to see how expensive legumes and pulses have become. I would always have considered them the lifeblood of budget cooking - protein and nutrition at a fraction of the cost of meat. But the two tins of mixed pulses I bought were the most expensive items in this basket by far - £1.09 each, compared to 33p for the baked beans.

This has become a bit evangelical, and it wasn't meant to. But it's been on my mind a lot, so I wanted to share. Read Jack's blog if you have time. Her words paint a much better picture than mine have. 

3 comments:

  1. Only just read this! Have lost track of all my blogs since a) I lost Google Reader, which I still mourn on a daily basis and b) since I had a baby, who I celebrate every day. Wow, what a post. And what a brilliant idea (both 1 coffee = 22 meals and the 10 pound food package). Much better than the silly suspended coffee idea, which I loved at first and then became increasingly grumpy about as I saw loads of fancy hipster cafes in areas not frequented by the down and out accruing hundreds of suspended coffees and rarely any takers. It seems like the ultimate swindle - cafes earn more money for goods not actually consume and earn credibility as social innovators and do-gooders at the same time. But anyway… I love the sound of this. The only thing is I was wondering, do you actually post those goods to someone in another country? It seems like that might be an inefficient use of resources and that there might be more effective and efficient ways of spreading the wealth, so to speak, though I do love the very personal nature of this. Great post. Please keep blogging, Toasty!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can't believe how much you got for 10 quid! Also, loving that book you recommended - The 10pm Question, so thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, totally agree with you about the suspended coffee thing. Nice idea, but not really practical.

    I think I may have accidentally confused/conflated things. My (actually sort of unrelated) idea had been to join the foodie penpals thing for £10 a month to give me some kind of foodie inspiration (and if I'd done that, then yes, you do post people stuff around the world. Not at all cost effective). But then I decided to put that £10 to better use and do the donation to a local foodbank instead. So the food you see above went to a local church which operates as a depot for the Northampton food bank, who collect and then distribute to people who need it. So minimal food 'miles' in that pile :-) Britain's use of foodbanks has gone up by something lke 400% since this government took office (and began the slow dismantling of the welfare state). Jack's story really hits for people I think because she is perfectly normal. She's maybe what you'd call upper working class (or lower middle class?) and she hit hard times and ended up needing to use foodbanks to survive. I think that's why she has become such a poster child for "austerity Britain". It's not - as the government would have you believe - about just working hard and 'getting on'...sometimes even people who do that can't survive. It makes me so sad and angry that people could be working full time but not earning enough to actually feed themselves and their families.

    But, as a lovely happy ending to one story in this - Jack's first cookbook is coming out tomorrow and I would imagine it will go straight to the top of the best-selling lists. Which is wonderful. And she continues to fight for people who are falling through society's cracks, paying herself only a living wage and donating many of the profits of her work to charities. Humbling, really!!

    Thanks for commenting. I've not posted for such a long time! Maybe I could get creative again. All my energies have been going into sewing lately! ;-)

    Glad you like the book - it's young adult fiction but I thought it was utterly charming...

    ReplyDelete